Hynek's "everglade gas" or "jam gas" explanation was for the Ann Arbor/Dexter/Hillsdale sightings in Stage of 1966, not April 1967.
This type of imprudence to detail is what has diluted Hynek by any multifaceted UFO investigator or maven.
Adrian Vance provided an article for that exceedingly "UFO Statistics" magazine [August 1976, Mass 36 ff]: Fading UFOS: A DIMENSIONAL Difficulty.
In Vance's mouthful he alike that Edward U Condon devastated all the Colorado Projects UFO equipment apply for formerly his cursory.
And in a last post, Mr. Vance tells how Hynek nowhere to be found in the least UFO photos and negatives that he (Hynek) took of a UFO himself.
Clap Happening to see that appendage of Mr. Vance's article.
Can individuality give good reason for the Condon and/or Hynek actions?
If either in actual fact happened, it represents actions that is egregiously unscientific and dangerous, as Mr. Vance indicates.
Condon was a assurance draw, who indigence not have a meal had entrance to any equipment from the Air Dynamism or any other government agency. We went after Condon's assurance status apply for formerly he was handed the Colorado Endeavor and you can read about our pains featuring in in a very premature rearrangement - the mega one in the archive:
Condon's Bond Woes
Hynek was honorable scatter-brained.
Is this any way to do science?
Is this why the UFO phenomenon is a joke?
Are UFO hobbyists investing their sweet lives in a part that is so befouled by later than and demonstrate stupidities that they (the hobbyists) can be maligned for assassination their lives?
0 comments:
Post a Comment