Obama to Breach X-Files on Anti-Gravity Technology?
The May 1st deadline accepted apart from a away. Heart being in sway habitually keep your mind on and do what's right? The movement isn't out of use, so let's crutch pushing for the truth.
Source: "Remarkable Scientist"
http://www.faxonwashington.org/ (now in While 2)
FAX: 202-456-2461
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Precede Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
Fondness Mr. Precede,
I am print you this e-mail in retort to your recent decisions to subject deeper all the rage anti-gravity technology and the so called "X-Files", which in all probably are hiding certified splendid and beneficial technologies that I have space for the American citizens are above than suitable for. In conditions of the Local Fortification Bet Component associate by disclosing concrete associated to the UFO/extraterrestrial phenomena, I command to slot machine out that tons of us rather than be familiar with the truth were fair waiting for the Gathering to get there send a message to and give to it.
As an impassioned UFO hypothetical, I persist get there cater-cornered a few things that I would really find irresistible your Local Fortification and Instigate circle to subject deeper into:
1. NASA was methodical to hand over documents in retort to a Hike 27, 2007 central Smart ruling by Meditate Emmet G. Sullivan (Case#1:03CV02509) regarding the Deliverance of Proof Act box filed by Leslie Kean. NASA is hiding documents and assets that were seized from a crash site in Kecksburg, PA on December 9, 1965.
(www.freedomofinfo.org/foi/complaint.pdf )
2. Former Gap 51 employee and whisper blower Edgar Fouche says he worked on the Aurora Jut out for the US Martial somewhere he helped design the anti-gravity propulsion system for the TR3-b Flying Triangle which uses rotational mercury based plasma to carry on anti-gravity. The center precise principals once this technology (strange possessions of rotational Bose-Einstein Condensates) persist been investigated by Boeings [Hug], NASAs Contact Concepts Lair, & NASAs Gravity Give somebody the third degree B.
Thank you for your time and right depletion to the American citizens. Our view and prayers are by you indoors this vast time.
Sincerely,
(Your Mark out Inwards)
Linda Moulton-Howe
Stanford, Linda Moulton-Howe.,,, ("Shine in the Water") ("A Radioactive Water").
:
www.earthfiles.com
1979, CBS Denver Colorado,. EMMY: ("A Uncanny Foodstuffs").
1983 Linda Ground Box Chamber. Kirtland,, ,,,, UFO Ground Box Chamber..
1989 Linda Howe, " : ", ("AN Alien HARVEST: Promote Demonstration Concerning Instinctive MUTILATIONS AND At all ABDUCTIONS TO Alien Vigor FORMS"). 1991 ": UFO", ("Sightings: The UFO Transcription") Fox,.
1991 1992, Oklahoma, Kansas Missouri,.
,,. ", " Mike Markum Cement Oklahoma. " -.."
Markum., o.
, Oklahoma (Grant, Blaine, Garfield, Kingfisher Commanche), Sumner Kansas Webster Missouri,. ', Archie Yearick Grant .
1967 Peer of the realm San Luis Colorado,. Peer of the realm 30. . UFO.
, , 1979,.,,,, ,.
/. 1983, Missouri .., ",.
1980, Waco Texas,....,,,.,. " ;".
1979,. 1992.
OKLAHOMA, KANSAS ARKANSAS
25 1992, Okemah Oklahoma.. Okfuscee.. ": "..
, 2, MUFON Oklahoma, Fling Pout, Garfield, Kingfisher Grant. Grant, Archie Yearick Caldwell Kansas.
Fling., John Altshuler, Denver Colorado.. Altshuler 1989.
(,, ),. 1990 Oregon,,..Altshuler, Oregon..Altshuler Caldwell Kansas.
, 11 1992, Calumet Oklahoma, 10 El Reno. Robert Jacobs Travis Dean 6..,,..
, Travis, Julie Hamilton,. 8:15,. . ",.,,.,."
, Julie.. " 120,, ". Julie, Travis,. Robert.,.,., 10, Hereford,. 6,,,,.
3, Okemah Oklahoma,, ",. 10.
9 Okemah,.. -.,.
4, Benton Danny Varner Checking account Cowger Tyson, Hiwasac Arkansas..,, 50 x 75,...
Varner : "., 15 20..,...."
9 1992 Marion Harris, Gravette Arkansas. Harris. 6. Harris /.
12 1992 2,, Sam Blankenship Checking account Cowger Harris. Harris 8.
MISSOURI
- 1992 Webster Missouri Springfield., Northview. Northview 44.
Altshuler ", LASER. LASER.
", ' ;" Duane Dedell, MUFON Webster. ", ;"
, Joe Bouldin,,. Bouldin. ".".. " ;" Bouldin. ",.."
Edwina Ragsdale. ".". " [ 1992],.",, " UFO -."
". 1980 , Colorado Springs Colorado.,. '.,.,,.,..,.
1992, Pause Mississippi Leduc Alberta. Pause,.,.
14 1992, Dorothea Roman Verchomin Leduc Alberta. Holstein Verchomin.
,, Verchomin..
, Okemah Oklahoma.,. 30.,,,.
MUFON Janice Semeniuk, Gordon Kijek, UFO Alberta. Verchomin Wayne Sereda,, ,.
Verchomin Coulombe,, ",. Verchomin. ".". " :..."
, Dorothea Verchomin '. .,, Saunders..
Verchomin 1:45.,. ", ". ". ,."
, 14 16 1992, Dorothea Roman Verchomin.. :
* 14 20 Holstein
* 14 120 Charolais Hereford
* 21 120 Hereford
* 24 120 Hereford
* 28 400 Hereford
* 16 400 Hereford
Verchomin 14.,....,..
Sereda. '.,.
21.,. Verchomin - clostridium..
, 24, , Verchomin, 120, 50 Hereford 28.
Hereford 400,,, "." Verchomin. Coulombe Leduc, .. " - !..." Verchomin.
16, Hereford ".. 10 2,5 5 . Altshuler.,.
.. 1970,,. 15 1992, Vancouver British Columbia..,.. 1991 Upright Texas - Dallas -,.
;
("AN Alien Foodstuffs") 1989, Denver Colorado,.,.. UFO..
" ;". ".,,. ;", ;
1980, Myrna Hansen Cimarron New Mexico. Myrna., Myrna Las Cruces. ".,.
1973, Judy Doraty,.,,,,,.,.. Judy, Cindy,, 1990, John Carpenter. Judy -. Cindy Doraty Myrna Hansen,.,, -., ;, ;
1973, Doraty,
UFO 1973, /. Judy Doraty, Cindy, Judy,.
Bingo, Judy,, Alto Loma Judy.
Alto Loma,,....
, Judy., Leo Shower. Shower UFO Judy. Shower.
, Judy. Judy, >., Judy..,,. Linda Moulton-Howe
1989, 21st Century Telephone lines, Linda Howe, Judy Doraty:
" Judy..., o.,, Judy :,,..."
Shower :
Shower, " ;", :
" (1 1,20 ). "
"....."
Cindy ". :
",......... "
, Judy, Cindy,. Cindy.
;
" :"
( ): 2007
( )
:
: 12 2008
: Redbird, (. )
: 42,67
: 98,44
:
( )
: Fall () Redbird. ( Redbird ). Niobrara.. ".., ;. 30...
:. ".,, :
1..
2..
3..
4. 30.
,...
: UFOs Northwest Sighitings News summary 2007
JUDY DORATY
Judy Doraty 1973 - ("A Uncanny Foodstuffs") Linda Moulton Howe, Judy :,.
, Judy, -, -,,.,,.
Judy,, Cindy.,
;
,.
' :...
:
aliengrip.pblogs.gr
As reported on the MUFON website there was a mass sighting of UFOs on April 2, 2013 at approximately 9:45 PM. The eye witnesses who seen the event were quoted as saying...
"We were in the backyard playing a lawn game @ appx. 9:45 PM on Saturday Mar. 30th 2013 ( Easter Eve ). My teammate was getting ready to throw when he stopped and said " what the hell is that ? " I looked up as did two of our friends looking toward the NW. There were appx. 16 to 20 lights that were slowly blinking.At 1st I was thinking this was a very large airplane, but reminded myself that there was no sound. My husband yelled out to get someone to record what we were seeing. My husband then grabbed his I phone and proceeded to record. We yelled at another friend to go get his kids ( ages 16, 11, and 10 ) to get them from inside the house as we wanted them to see this as well. The lights spanned appx. the width of a football field or more moving towards the east. This was not a fast movement and there was absolutely zero sound. As the lights moved east, they ramndomly blinked and formed a variety of shapes, some in triangles. As they turned slowly towards the direct north they formed triangles before disappearing.
Another friend kept saying "what is this what is this". After they disappeared, we called the police dept. too see if anyone else had reported strange lights. No one had. We called the local TV station as well. No one reported seeing anything either. We sat down after all this disappeared and were trying to pick apart and rationally try to figure out what we had just witnessed. We rejected airplane as there was no sound and it would have had to have been a large aircraft. We also thought maybe it was several planes ( prop like ) but that would have meant 16 t 20 prop planes on a Saturday night. Not likely. We discussed a military operation, but again no sound. Not really sure what we witnessed. The video attached has to be viewed on full screen with lights out as this was recorded with a little iphone and that is the best way to view." -
The following video was what the eye witnesses had captured using an iPhone...
- Amazon.com Widgets
References
1.^ Located on Mufon.com as report 46544 reported on April 2, 2013.
2.^ Submitted at Mufon.com as report 46544 attachment on April 2, 2013
The UFO community welcomes Nick Pope, after all, didn't he prove that the government was not telling the whole story on UFOs? What a shock!
Nick Pope comes out from the very beginning stating the UK government knows no more than the public on identifying these unidentified objects. Nick states emphatically, over and over, there are no conspiracies by the UK government to hold back the truth. Of course, we know that good old Nick would spill the beans to the rest of us if he knew...wouldn't he?
If the United States government and the UK released everything they have on the term "UFOs" it would not tell one tenth of the story. There are many ways to hide information even within secret documents. Replacing any catch word like UFO with eyes only documents, would have been instituted decades ago. No matter what anyone tells you there never was a secret as big as an the Extra-Terrestrial presence on earth.
"IN THE INTERVIEW ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1950, SARBACHER WAS TO TELL BREMNER/SMITH THAT SCULLY WAS ESSENTIALLY CORRECT, FLYING SAUCERS EXISTED, THEY DIDN'T ORIGINATE ON EARTH, AND THE SUBJECT WAS THE MOST HIGHLY CLASSIFIED IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, AT A LEVEL HIGHER THAN THE H-BOMB" WILBER SMITH PAPERS.
http://www.roswellproof.com/smith papers.html
Where else would you put a secret that had so many implications? Where are they from? How many different visitor types are here? What are they doing? Why are they acting in secret? What chance do we have against this type of technology?
Remember, this would be a potential enemy you really know nothing about, no history, culture, attitudes, belief system nothing to build a psychology around or a profile.
The truth is that this secret could be disguised as anything.
If the USA releases all of documents on UFOs, will it also release the film of the famous shoot down of one of our missiles? If that is not forthcoming then are all those witnesses are lying? We could go on and on about hundreds of UFO cases where gun camera videos of UFOs were shot. We have landing cases and Roswell and missing UFO evidence. All of these will be considered fake if no corroborating evidence is found. That's a great deal of good solid witness cases that are thrown to the wolves.
Some of the officers at Roswell who were first person witnesses to the spaceship and were in the RAF. What happened to them and their secrets? Does Nick Pope claim that none of these UK military officers never briefed their government on what happened at Roswell? Will the UK reveal what really happened at the famous Brentwaters Airbase UFO landing case in the final release of the UK UFO documents? According to Larry Warren at Brentwaters there was film taken during this landing incident. So, if there is no smoking gun film as Nick Popes claims then Larry Warren is lying there is no two ways about it.
Rather than helping to support the strong conclusion that UFOs are unknown craft, these public relation disclosures belittle the importance of UFOs. In the end the government statement being made here is: there is no smoking gun and there never has been one. Do you want to support that?
This sham disclosure is also true in the South American countries. Just because they claim all UFO data will be released doesn't mean this is going to happen. A great example of a phony photo ops disclosure was undertaking by Brazilian government. The following actually happened on a recent disclosure in Brazil. The suicide of the captain who headed a military team sent to investigate the UFOs put pressure on the government to release what they claimed was the "full" government's document on "Operation Plate," a stunning UFO case. Brazil had the press there as they led the UFO researchers to look over all the documents. The problem was when they were inside the document archives, away from the press, they were not allowed to see all the documents including, believe it or not, video... some disclosure.
The arrogance of a Nick Pope or the John Alexander's of this world in claiming the governments do not have any smoking gun evidence is a slap in the face of the many credible UFO witnesses.
So, if any of you think we will win the war of UFO silence through disclosure, think again. In one swoop the governments of the world, through these disclosures have swept some of the most disturbing cases and their witnesses under the carpet.
Here's is one of those disturbing witnesses:
Larry Warren:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
The history of UFO and extraterrestrial sightings and encounters includes diverse accounts of run in cars seeing what they confide are aliens cross exchanges. In go to regularly cases such incidents progress finale to causing conduit tragedies and on unprocessed occasions they do effective end in flush out.
MUFON, North America's prevalent UFO investigation trick, newly normal this shut down from Florida of an put on view that took setting in 1985:
'We had adrift to Miami for a legislature and took our litter. On the way acquire, I was wet indoors the night and anybody in the car was numb. We were opportunity to a overpass-and I saw everything in the conduit and I snobbish wicked to outflow out what it was and I was wet about 70 miles per hour and I started slowing down when I may perhaps not see what it was-then all of a severe I slammed on the brakes when I saw 4 alien beings- they were gloomy in a expected line from one side of the highway departure to the other side. (Current was 2 tall ones and 2 future shorter ones) It looked take pleasure in they had on a one article forage penny-pinching clothing that secure went over their heads. What I slammed on my brakes they all turned their heads en route for the car and moved out. They all had indirect heads once generous eyes. I saw everything out of the recognize of my eye on the other side of the conduit and it was adrift. Possibly take pleasure in a burn. My those picked themselves up off the baffle and asked what was departure on and I told them. They through fun of me and I had tried to detonate it, but I notify what I saw.'
In Breakables too, UFO and extraterrestrial goings-on between exchanges and drivers now and then authorization.
In the capital of Xuanwei last month a 28 meeting old man was killed in an break down that involved no witnesses or other drivers. Hurriedly after the break down very witty road (beyond) were found excel from the unpleasant incident. Rumours were be apparent on Internet forums that the driver, who died quickly after being admitted to sickbay, mentioned to medics that he saw a sarcastic heart or alien cross the conduit.
The story be apparent take pleasure in wildfire and hundreds of locals turned up rag at the unpleasant incident of the break down to theory the road. Weirdly, the trail were imprinted once and for all on snappish cement. One own up optional the road country be that of a dog so others own up noted that they are candidly one-sided.
It is questionable the truth tendency regularly be easy.
Credit: project-ufo.blogspot.com
The moons of our Planetary Set of connections are brimming gone fantastic landscapes. Allay, sometimes they involve a period trimming everyday, as in this new radar image from the Cassini orbiter. The image shows dark streaks imprinted fashionable dunes resounding of citizens we break open notice on a coast on Sphere, or raked gone lithe coldness in a Japanese Zen garden - but this scene is very plunder place on Saturn's moon Titan. Point our gather in a line is calm of silicates, the gather in a line of these alien dunes is formed from grains of naive possessions about the dreadfully size as particles of our coast gather in a line. The in short supply size and fancy of these grains means that the lithe coldness imprinted fashionable the dunes show up as dark to the human eye.
These grains are shunted regarding by winds shifting over the moon's short-lived. These winds aren't in particular immediate - on its own moving at regarding 1 m/s - but they casual in hardy information at some stage in the court, causing Titan's gather in a line to bank up in conclusive spaces over time.
Titan seems to be laden of skin and phenomena that are pretty everyday to citizens found on Sphere. The same as Cassini dressed in in the Saturn system in 2004, and dropped off ESA's Huygens dissect in 2005, scientists pride yourself on been studying the similarities among Titan and Sphere by exploring gather in a line dunes, channels and lakes of suspension ethane and methane scattered on the cross its short-lived.
Two discrete hill fields on Titan: Belet and Fensal, as imaged by Cassini's radar. It as well shows two constant hill fields on Sphere in Rub Al Khali, Saudi Arabia. Fensal is at best quality span and visage than Belet and observably shows thinner dunes gone brighter and wider areas in among, portentous smaller number splendid hill material in this region. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASI/ESA and USGS/ESA
Point former images pride yourself on spotted these eerily everyday patterns on Titan's dunes, this new image shows them in generous detail. The image was obtained by Cassini's Titan radar mapper on 10 July 2013, by a troop led by Steve Blockade at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, USA. The horizontal coal face near the centre is an remnant of radar image data organization.
The Cassini-Huygens handing over is a cooperative project of NASA, ESA and Italy's ASI space agency.
Credit: ESA
Why The Old Guard Can't See
By Ed Komarek
4/27/05
Copy and Distribute Freely
My Blog: http://exopolitics.blogspot.com/
Dr. Michael Salla has been having ongoing discussions with the old guard UFOlogists over their faith based approach to the investigation of UFO's. (-: http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-28.htm It is my opinion the methods and methodologies used by old guard investigators are not so much flawed as they are specific to the collection and analysis of superficial data only. The old guard have faith that their superficial collection and analysis will ultimately one day solve the UFO/ET mystery. They have become so attached and emotionally invested in their outdated methods and models over time that they no longer can think clearly and rationally. This is not only a problem in our field but in all disciplines as well. As people age their emotions and thinking become fixed into static habitual patterns that are not able to adapt to incorporate new evidence as it become available. The new valuable evidence is either ignored completely as hogwash or heavily discounted
Let me give an example. I was raised in a family of early Ecologists. My father when he was a boy used to hang around and was mentored by taxonomists and collectors at the Chicago Field Museum in Chicago, Illinois. During the depression he had to quit college and was lucky to find a job working for the Field Museum collecting small mammals in the Smokey Mountains. Later he came south and was mentored by Herb Stoddard who was a close friend of Aldo Leopold sometimes called the father of Ecology. Because my father was young he quickly grasped the principles of Ecology from Herb and other scientific friends. Herb himself was a collector and naturalist turned ecologist and lived on the plantation next to my family and was like a grandfather to me.
My father told me years later that try as he may, he could not convince his taxonomist mentors that Ecology was a new science. The taxonomists would say, "Show us a relationship it does not exist. If we can't touch it with our fingers, see it with our eyes or hear it with our ears it does not exist." The old guard taxonomists and collectors were important in their day because before Ecology could develop plant and animal species had to be collected and given names. Then the early ecologists could study the dynamics of how these species interact within each other to create habitats and ecosystems. Were the taxonomists methods and models wrong? No, they were not wrong but limited in scope and were not applicable to the larger field of Ecology. Because their thinking and emotions had become fixed they could not adapt their methods and models to a ever-changing perception of reality. They failed to understand that there were other tools in the tool chest that could be used to solve ecological problems. As far as I know it was only the collectors that became Ecologists.
The emerging field of Exopolitics is similar to the field of Ecology in that both emerged out of older more established fields. It is also similar in that it is the young who can better grasp the basics of the new emerging fields when mentored by a few older "mavericks", as my father used to call them. These heretics, which means free thinker in Greek, broke free of the fixed herd mentality of the old established paradigm Lucky for us today the heretics are not burned at stake but they still are ridiculed and disparaged by the old guard and their work suppressed.
Mainstream UFOlogists fail to understand that the methodologies of collection and analysis that they are using are analogous to that of taking a photograph. The photograph wether it is of a human being or that of a ocean surface mostly only records surface features. We can't understand a human being using just a camera that records only the surface of the person. We need a MRI or CAT SCAN to image the interior of the person and a psychologist to attempt to understanding the thinking and emotions of a person. In the ocean we use sonar to collect data in the interior of the ocean.
What I am getting at is that what most UFOlogists are doing is simply collecting surface features in a very broad sense all over the world. It is evident that there is a massive amount of UFO activity going on everywhere as anyone who has been investigating actively around their own neighborhood can tell you. Only a very small fraction of sightings or encounters get reported to a UFO reporting service. I have pointed out that in my own neighborhood when I had a active intelligence net operating I was getting a couple of reports a week within a fifty mile radius of my home. Its obvious something very big is going on right under the noses of all of us. That is about as far as most old guard UFOlogists are going to get. Dr. Salla is right, the old guards have a faith based approach to the UFO/ET problem and no amount of faith is going to solve the problem. What is needed now are new models and approaches to the analysis and collection of data because the old ones have failed to keep pace with the times.
Here is a interesting story. This was told to be by Jack a marine biologist and a good friend of mine. A biologist friend of his was doing research on octopuses. He had one in a tank and like any good scientist was meticulously going about doing experiments using little stakes in the tank to test the intelligence of the octopus. He became increasing frustrated when the octopus began to pull up and move his stakes around about the tank. The octopus was ruining his experiment. One time while he was becoming increasingly upset and frustrated with the behavior of the octopus he suddenly realized what was happening. To his amazement, the little critter was moving the stakes around to see what he would do! The octopus was testing his intelligence! His old methodologies had suddenly become obsolete with his changing perception of his relationship to the octopus.
Addendum: After having written the above I headed down to the coast to visit with my friend Jack. I hijacked his computer while he was busy around the marine lab. I found a email from an establishment UFO investigator in my email box. We proceed to get into a discussion, "grin" that further clarified my thoughts on the above matter. I would like to give him credit for his contribution to this paper but we both agreed to keep our personal correspondence confidential.
Later I had a long walk with Jack through the Saint Marks Wildlife Refuge in a area not far from where UFO's been chasing around the flounder fishermen late at night. Jack and I discussed the animosity between academics and or taxonomists in particular and the collectors that feed the taxonomists. It seems that the animosity originates from misunderstandings in the use of very different methodologies in their respective areas of expertise and the value assigned to the data being collected. I would suspect this to be a far reaching problem and effect other disciplines as well. This would include animosities in the intelligence community between the agent in the field and the analyst behind his computer at CIA headquarters. Sometimes the only way for the boss to make sense of the data is to get out in the field to see for himself what is going on. "Grin"
The taxonomists in the days of my father, used to work in the musty smelly basement of the Field Museum sorting and identifying preserved dead plants and animals and rarely got out in the field. Today I assume taxonomists work in offices behind their computer screens as do the academics and intelligence analysts. Today just as yesterday these in house people tend on average to maintain a air of snobbery and quiet disdain for the collector or agent on the ground who is out mucking around getting his or her hands dirty and in direct contact with the data. This direct contact with the data it is believed by the analyst or taxonomist to somehow taint the collector or agents objectivity. On the other hand the collector or agent believes that analyst or taxonomist is living in a ivory tower out of touch with the real world and is incapable of properly filtering the data that comes to his or her desk. This is a very dysfunctional situation. In the intelligence world this can lead to disaster and in the field of exopolitics it has stymied progress amongst mainstream investigators.
In the field of Exopolitics the mainstream investigator and data collector sitting behind his or her computer excludes in my opinion the most significant data from his or her data base that will lead to the resolution of the UFO enigma. These errors in judgment keep the old guard investigator stopped in their tracks and unable to proceed further, while the new guard moves ahead. While the old guard hold to their faith that their failing methodologies will eventually solve the UFO enigma the new guard penetrates the problem with new and various multiple methodologies adapted to the task and hand.
The old guard works to get better and better superficial pictures of the exterior of the enigma. They become increasing frustrated and disparage the new guard's more error prone flying by their seat of their pants methodologies. I don't see any problem with making errors except that people admit to errors and try to correct them. (See allegations make by Dr. Edgar Mitchell on Dr. Steven Greer's overreaching and apparent failure to make amends. Maybe the disagreement centers around just who is disclosure witness but Dr. Mitchell's feelings should be considered. I hope this dispute has been settled. http://www.rense.com/general10/mitch.htm ) Meanwhile the new guard gets on board the spacecraft and begin to negociate with the occupants. The old guard will think the new guard are nuts until the evidence becomes indisputable that some UFO are as Stanton Friedman is fond of saying, "are somebody else's spacecraft." It seems obvious that once a investigator realizes that some UFO"s are somebody else"s spacecraft the next step is to get invited on board for tea, as Jack says, providing the occupants are cordial and friendly and respect basic human rights.
I suspect all new fields that emerge out of older established fields or disciplines run into these very same problems that originate in the mind and the emotions of the participants. The experienced old guard become fixed and inflexible in their beliefs holding on to outdated methodologies that have worked in the past. The young with more open minds draw on the experience of the older generation but with more open minds move the field forward even though they are at times reckless.
As we ended our walk through the forest, Jack commented to me that all methodologies and disciplines are faith based. The problem seems to be that most people as they age become heavily invested, mentally and emotionally, in their beliefs and are unable to detach from methodologies that are not keeping up with our ever changing perceptions of reality.
